Lions VS PACK

A place for Red Wings Central visitors to talk about off-topic sports -- Lions, Tigers, Pistons, college sports or anything else you'd like.

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby thirteen on Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:58 pm

Image
The barbrady school of debate
thirteen
 
Posts: 2772
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:17 pm




Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby Resmo112 on Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:28 pm

Barbrady wrote:
thirteen wrote:I think Suh was being stupid with that kick for every reason but kicking the guy. I personally couldn't give a shit if he did it. But it's the public reaction that will taint him almost permanently. When a reputation snowballs eventually people don't even know why they think a player is (dirty, respectable, etc). They just think it.

What I find stupid though is if he kicked a guy anytime from 1940 to 1980 or so, he'd be called a hard nosed, intimidating player who didn't take any shit. Kick him now? ZOMG WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?


What I find stupid though is if it was a Green Bay Packer that had stomped a Lion on Thursday, you'd be crying all about how that player should be suspended for the rest of the season.

HERPA DERP!


Kinda like how he was with smith, loved Shanny right up until that, then Shanny was doing stupid things!
And it's all for me grog, me jolly, jolly grog All for me beer and tobacco Well I spent all me tin on the lassies drinking gin
User avatar
Resmo112
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:16 am

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby Barbrady on Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:39 pm

Resmo112 wrote:
Barbrady wrote:
thirteen wrote:I think Suh was being stupid with that kick for every reason but kicking the guy. I personally couldn't give a shit if he did it. But it's the public reaction that will taint him almost permanently. When a reputation snowballs eventually people don't even know why they think a player is (dirty, respectable, etc). They just think it.

What I find stupid though is if he kicked a guy anytime from 1940 to 1980 or so, he'd be called a hard nosed, intimidating player who didn't take any shit. Kick him now? ZOMG WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?


What I find stupid though is if it was a Green Bay Packer that had stomped a Lion on Thursday, you'd be crying all about how that player should be suspended for the rest of the season.

HERPA DERP!


Kinda like how he was with smith, loved Shanny right up until that, then Shanny was doing stupid things!


Exactly. Brendan Smith shouldn't have been suspended, but Chris Stewart deserved more than 3 games.
"If (Jason Williams) was half as bad as you guys are trying to paint him, he'd be long gone from this elite organization." ~Octopus ca. 2010
User avatar
Barbrady
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby Barbrady on Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:41 pm

thirteen wrote:Image
The barbrady school of debate


HERPA DERP!!!!!!!!!!!!
"If (Jason Williams) was half as bad as you guys are trying to paint him, he'd be long gone from this elite organization." ~Octopus ca. 2010
User avatar
Barbrady
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby thirteen on Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:24 pm

Resmo112 wrote:
Barbrady wrote:
thirteen wrote:I think Suh was being stupid with that kick for every reason but kicking the guy. I personally couldn't give a shit if he did it. But it's the public reaction that will taint him almost permanently. When a reputation snowballs eventually people don't even know why they think a player is (dirty, respectable, etc). They just think it.

What I find stupid though is if he kicked a guy anytime from 1940 to 1980 or so, he'd be called a hard nosed, intimidating player who didn't take any shit. Kick him now? ZOMG WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?


What I find stupid though is if it was a Green Bay Packer that had stomped a Lion on Thursday, you'd be crying all about how that player should be suspended for the rest of the season.

HERPA DERP!


Kinda like how he was with smith, loved Shanny right up until that, then Shanny was doing stupid things!

You realize Barbrady's not being as serious as you are right? You actually mean that ridiculous crock of shit. Barbrady's just a malnutritioned kid in his stepmom's basement living off of mountain dew and fingernail clippings, living for attention because no one hugged him as a child.
thirteen
 
Posts: 2772
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby Barbrady on Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:40 pm

thirteen wrote:You realize Barbrady's not being as serious as you are right? You actually mean that ridiculous crock of shit. Barbrady's just a malnutritioned kid in his stepmom's basement living off of mountain dew and fingernail clippings, living for attention because no one hugged him as a child.


Says the guy with over twice as many posts in less than half the amount of time on the forum...

Reminds me of the days when Octo would pull out the same "lives in his mom's basement" isults while posting 20 times per day at all hours. :lol: :lol:
"If (Jason Williams) was half as bad as you guys are trying to paint him, he'd be long gone from this elite organization." ~Octopus ca. 2010
User avatar
Barbrady
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby thirteen on Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:05 pm

Whoa, my whopping 5 posts per day :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

FAIL
thirteen
 
Posts: 2772
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby goathair on Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:08 pm

Go Wings wrote:
Resmo112 wrote:
Go Wings wrote:
Resmo112 wrote:wait, stafford usually sucks? because that doesn't seem to be the case.


What did they say 8 interceptions in his last 2 and a half games? Yah that would qualify as sucking.



5 int and 19 touchdowns in his first 8....yeah that would qualify as one of the best in the league.


And let's look at the "great" teams Detroit beat during those first 8 games shall we.

Tampa Bay
Kansas City
Minnesota
Dallas
Chicago
Denver

A combined amazing record of 29-32

BTW they lost to Atlanta and San Francisco during those 8 games too.



aren't 4-5 of those teams fighting for a playoff spot?
goathair
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Lions VS PACK

Unread postby Resmo112 on Sun Nov 27, 2011 5:16 pm

goathair wrote:
Go Wings wrote:
Resmo112 wrote:
Go Wings wrote:
Resmo112 wrote:wait, stafford usually sucks? because that doesn't seem to be the case.


What did they say 8 interceptions in his last 2 and a half games? Yah that would qualify as sucking.



5 int and 19 touchdowns in his first 8....yeah that would qualify as one of the best in the league.


And let's look at the "great" teams Detroit beat during those first 8 games shall we.

Tampa Bay
Kansas City
Minnesota
Dallas
Chicago
Denver

A combined amazing record of 29-32

BTW they lost to Atlanta and San Francisco during those 8 games too.



aren't 4-5 of those teams fighting for a playoff spot?



Yup, don't argue with go wings logic here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And it's all for me grog, me jolly, jolly grog All for me beer and tobacco Well I spent all me tin on the lassies drinking gin
User avatar
Resmo112
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:16 am

Re: Lions VS PACK

Unread postby thirteen on Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:11 pm

Go Wings is right and wrong here. Wrong, in the way that shitty opponents don't automatically make you shitty. Right though in the way that yes, 3 or 4 of the 6 of those teams suck and possibly 5 if Denver's defense stops playing out of their minds which they very well might. Just because you're hunting for a playoff spot during the 11th week or so doesn't mean a whole lot. TB, KC, Minnesota and arguably Dallas and Denver suck. And it doesn't mean a whole lot.
thirteen
 
Posts: 2772
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:17 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Off-Topic Sports Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests